In depth analysis of the above cited provisions:-<\/strong>On perusing the above provisions and clarifications, the following observations are worth noting:-<\/p>\n

\n
1. The notification no. 22\/2015-ST dated 06.11.2015 seeks to levy SBC at the rate of 0.5% on taxable value of all services with effect from 15.11.2015. It is pertinent to note that section 119 of chapter VI of the Finance Act, 2015 specifies that SBC would be leviable at the rate of 2% on the value of all or specified services. This notification gives exemption to the levy of SBC beyond 0.5% thereby meaning that in the statue the rate of SBC is 2% but it is vide this notification that SBC will be leviable at the rate of 0.5%. This reflects the probability of fluctuating this SBC from time to time within a range of 2% of the value of taxable services. Moreover, in the section 119 of the Finance Act, it was indicated that SBC will be levied on certain specified services but this notification seeks to levy SBC on all services except exempted services.<\/li>\n
2. The new levy SBC is being implemented with effect from 15.11.2015, in the mid of month which is not at all understandable and has increased complexities. The assessees will face practical difficulties in reflecting the amount of SBC for the month of November in the service tax return. Moreover, the government has also increased its task to make suitable changes in the return format. The new levy should have been made effect from beginning of a new quarter so that compliance could have been made little easy.<\/li>\n
3. \u00a0With the abolishment of Education Cess and SHE Cess, the assessees were under the impression that their compliance would reduce slightly as it was mandatory to maintain separate records for Education Cess and SHE Cess and there was also restriction that the cenvat of Education Cess and SHE Cess could be utilised only for payment of Education Cess and SHE Cess. However, there has been no reduction in the compliance mechanism as the assessees are once again required to maintain separate records for the new levy of SBC. There is also separate accounting code for payment of SBC, its interest and penalty.<\/li>\n
4. \u00a0SBC is not cenvatable as stated in the FAQ released and available on CBEC website. This has tremendous adverse consequence to the assessees as SBC will become the cost and will not be available as cenvat credit. This is the major drawback of new levy as it ignores the concept of \u2018cascading effect\u2019. Moreover, as SBC is not cenvatable, service tax paid on input services consumed by exporters will form cost of exported goods\/services thereby leading to export of domestic taxes abroad which will definitely go against the \u2018Make in India slogan\u2019 of the government. Further, it is remote possibility that the exporters will be able to claim refund of the SBC paid by them on various input services. The consequences of making SBC non-cenvatable are extremely adverse and far reaching. Hence, it is prayed that amendment is made in the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 as soon as possible because when all the provisions applicable to service tax are made applicable to this SBC, then the credit of SBC should also be allowed.<\/li>\n
5. \u00a0The major issue that is haunting the minds of the assessees is the absurdity in the effective implementation date of this new levy, SBC. Although, the notification no. 21\/2015-ST dated 06.11.2015 specifies that the provisions of chapter VI of the Finance Act, 2015 pertaining to SBC will be applicable from 15.11.2015 but the applicability of Point of Taxation Rules, 2011 seeks to contradict this notification. This is for the reason that the section 119(5) of Chapter VI states that \u201cThe provisions of Chapter V of the Finance Act,<\/em> 1994 and <\/em>the rules made thereunder, including those relating to refunds and exemptions <\/em>from tax, interest and imposition of penalty shall, as far as may be, apply in <\/em>relation to the levy and collection of the Swachh Bharat Cess on taxable <\/em>services, as they apply in relation to the levy and collection of tax on such <\/em>taxable services under Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994 or the rules made <\/em>thereunder, as the case may be.\u201d <\/em>Consequently, the provisions of Point of Taxation Rules, 2011 are also made applicable due to which in certain circumstances, SBC is leviable even if service was provided prior to 15.11.2015. Moreover, the clarification of FAQ regarding applicability of Rule 5 itself is doubted. Furthermore, the time period for issuance of invoice is wrongly mentioned as 14 days instead of \u201930 days\u2019. The detailed analysis of the provisions of POTR with respect to SBC are as follows:-<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n
   \n

   Rule 4 of the Point of Taxation Rules, 2011 where there is change in effective rate of tax:- <\/em><\/strong>According to this Rule, whenever there is change in effective rate of tax, the occurrence of any two events out of three events will determine the rate of tax. The three events are date of provision of service, date of issue of invoice and date of receipt of payment for the service. Whenever any two out of the above cited three events occur, the rate of tax applicable on the occurrence of the said events will be relevant. This can be illustrated by the following example:-<\/p>\n

    <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n

   Date<\/strong><\/td>\n	of<\/strong><\/td>\n	Date of issue<\/strong><\/td>\n	Date<\/strong><\/td>\n	of<\/strong><\/td>\n	Point<\/strong><\/td>\n	of<\/strong><\/td>\n	Whether<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
   provision<\/strong><\/td>\n	of<\/strong><\/td>\n	of invoice<\/strong><\/td>\n	payment<\/strong><\/td>\n	to<\/strong><\/td>\n	Taxation<\/strong><\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	SBC<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
   service<\/strong><\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	service<\/strong><\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	Date<\/strong><\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	leviable?<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
   <\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	provider<\/strong><\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
   <\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
   31.10.2015<\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	02.11.2015<\/td>\n	17.11.2015<\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	31.10.2015<\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	No<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
   <\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
   31.10.2015<\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	16.11.2015<\/td>\n	17.11.2015<\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	16.11.2015<\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	Yes<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
   <\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	<\/td>\n	<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n \n  <\/p>\n Rule 5 of the Point of Taxation Rules, 2011 when service has been made taxable for the first time \nfrom a particular date:- <\/em><\/strong>According to this Rule, no tax will be payable under following two situations:-<\/p>\n (a)\u00a0 If the invoice has been issued and payment has been received before the date on which service became taxable.<\/p>\n (b)If the payment has been received before the service becomes taxable and invoice has been issued within 30 days from the date of completion of the provision of service.<\/p>\n Rule 7 of the Point of Taxation Rules, 2011 in case of reverse charge mechanism:- <\/em><\/strong>This Rule starts with \u2018Non-Obstante\u2019 clause and has overriding effect over all the Rules of POTR. Notwithstanding anything contained in these rules, point of taxation in respect of persons required to pay tax as recipients of service shall be the date on which payment is made. If the payment is not made within a period of 3 months from the date of invoice, the point of taxation shall be the date immediately following the expiry of three months from the date of invoice. Furthermore, in case of associated enterprises where the person providing the service is located outside India, the point of taxation shall be the date of debit in the books of account of the service receiver or the date of making payment, whichever is earlier.<\/p>\n If the above cited provisions of Point of Taxation Rules, 2011 are pursued, it is found that the FAQ clarifying that the Rule 5 of the POTR, 2011 will be applicable appears to be erroneous for the following reasons:-<\/p>\n \n Firstly, Rule 5 of POTR applies when a new service is taxed for the first time. However, SBC is not a new service rather it is new levy on existing taxable services. Although SBC is taxed for the first time but that cannot lead to conclusion that the provisions of Rule 5 of POTR would come into picture. On the contrary, according to author\u2019s view, Rule 4 and Rule 7 of the POTR are applicable.<\/li>\n Secondly, the time period of 14 days for issuance of invoice has already been amended as 30 days with effect from 01.04.2012 but the example given refers to the period of 14 days for issuance of invoice.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n \n \n Thirdly, there is already contradiction between the provisions of section 67A of the Finance Act, 1994 and the Rule 4 of the Point of Taxation Rules, 2011. The provision of section 67A are produced for quick reference as follows:-<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n Section 67A of the Finance Act:- Date of determination of rate of tax, value of taxable service and rate of exchange <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n The rate of service tax<\/em><\/strong>, value of taxable service and rate of exchange, if any, shall be the rate of service tax or value of a taxable service or rate of exchange, as the case may be, in force or as applicable at the<\/strong> time when the taxable service has been provided or agreed to be provided<\/strong>. <\/em><\/p>\n However, as per Rule 4 of the POTR, the rate applicable at the point of taxation date is to be considered as applicable rate of tax. Say for example, in the situation when rate of tax was increased from 12% to 14% with effect from 01.06.2015. If the service was provided on 28.05.2015 but the invoice was raised on 05.06.2015 and payment was also made to service provider on 07.06.2015, the new rate of tax, i.e., 14% would be applicable as per Rule 4 of POTR, 2011. However, as per section 67A, the rate applicable on the date of provision of service should be considered being 12%. S<\/p>\n Similarly, the SBC is being implemented with effect from 15.11.2015 but if the Rule 4 of POTR, 2011 is made applicable, in certain situation as depicted in situation 2 of example table above, SBC will be leviable even if the service was provided prior to 15.11.2015. This will go against the provision of notification no. 21\/2015-ST dated 06.11.2015 which clearly states that SBC is to be implemented with effect from 15.11.2015.<\/p>\n Good bye words:-<\/strong>On one hand, the government is promoting its slogan of \u2018Ease of doing business in India\u2019 and \u2018Make in India\u2019 while on the other hand, the legislations being introduced are defeating the very purpose of ease of doing business because they are complicating the taxation even more. Not only this, making SBC non-cenvatable, will have direct impact on exports of our Country because it amounts to exporting domestic taxes abroad. Well, all we can say is\u00a0that although the purpose of this new levy is to make Bharat Swachh but on the contrary, this cess will clean the pockets of assessees!<\/p>\n<\/div>\n \u00a0This article is contributed by\u00a0CA Pradeep Jain and\u00a0<\/strong><\/em>CA Neetu Sukhwani.<\/strong><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Preface:-The moment when it was announced by the Hon\u2019ble Finance Minister that the exemption is being provided to the levy of Education Cess and Secondary & Higher Education Cess, there was a sigh of relief that there will be reduction in the rate of service tax. Moreover, it was represented by the trade that the … Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":17,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","_mi_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[87],"class_list":["post-301","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-services-tax","tag-cess"],"yoast_head":"\n